🔗 Share this article

According to a new examination, numerous of individuals with histories in the petroleum sector have been placed within the current government, comprising more than 40 who formerly served straight for oil companies.

Background of the Study

This report investigated the backgrounds of appointees and officials positioned in the White House and eight national departments responsible for environmental regulation. Those cover important entities such as the Environmental Protection Agency, the interior agency, and the Department of Energy.

Wider Policy Environment

This review surfaces during ongoing efforts to roll back environmental policies and alternative energy incentives. For instance, latest acts have unlocked large regions of federal land for extraction and phased out support for sustainable energy.

With the barrage of terrible developments that have transpired on the climate arena... it’s vital to remind the citizens that these aren’t just measures from the amorphous, ginormous thing that is the leadership writ large, commented one researcher involved in the study. They are frequently particular individuals originating from certain wealthy groups that are implementing this damaging pro-industry agenda.

Major Findings

Analysts discovered 111 personnel whom they classified as industry insiders and alternative energy adversaries. This encompasses 43 officials who were personally employed by coal firms. Included in them are well-known leading officials including the head of energy, who earlier acted as chief executive of a fracking firm.

This roster additionally contains lesser-known White House members. As an illustration, the division responsible for renewable energy is led by a previous fracking executive. In the same vein, a top policy consultant in the administration has served in top-level roles at prominent oil firms.

Further Links

An additional 12 personnel possess links to fossil fuel-funded conservative policy organizations. These include former employees and researchers of organizations that have vigorously opposed alternative sources and advocated the continuation of traditional energy.

Moreover 29 other officials are ex- business leaders from manufacturing fields whose operations are directly linked to oil and gas. Other personnel have relationships with power companies that market traditional energy or government leaders who have pushed pro-coal agendas.

Agency Concentration

Researchers found that 32 personnel at the interior agency by themselves have ties to fossil fuel industries, making it the highest influenced federal body. This includes the leader of the office, who has consistently accepted industry donations and served as a bridge between energy business contributors and the campaign.

Political Contributions

Energy contributors donated sizable resources to the election operation and swearing-in. Since entering the White House, the leadership has not only implemented pro-fossil fuel policies but also designed incentives and tariff carveouts that favor the field.

Experience Concerns

In addition to industry-linked nominees, the authors found multiple administration officials who were appointed to key jobs with minimal or no relevant expertise.

These people may not be tied to oil and gas so directly, but their inexperience is concerning, remarked a co-author. It’s plausible to think they will be pushovers, or susceptible individuals, for the fossil fuel plans.

For example, the appointee to lead the environmental agency’s office of legal affairs has very little legal experience, having not ever argued a legal matter to verdict, not taken a sworn statement, and never presented a legal request.

During an additional example, a executive assistant working on regulatory issues moved to the position after being employed in jobs unrelated to energy, with no obvious relevant energy industry or administrative expertise.

White House Reaction

A spokesperson for the White House rejected the findings, commenting that the leadership’s appointees are exceptionally competent to execute on the people’s directive to boost national fuel production.

Previous and Present Environment

The leadership implemented a substantial series of pro-industry measures during its previous term. In its present term, prepared with rightwing agendas, it has initiated a much broader and harsher crackdown on climate policies and clean power.

There’s no hesitation, commented a analyst. They are proud and willing to go out there and promote the fact that they are performing benefits for the oil and gas industry, mining sector, the energy industry.